
The special session about the Mid-Currituck Bridge scheduled within the Southern Shores Town Council’s regular meeting tomorrow, at 10 a.m., in the Pitts Center, is being held a day before a critical vote on the bridge’s future by delegates from 10 counties in Northeastern North Carolina.
The Albemarle Rural Planning Organization (ARPO), which serves Camden, Chowan, Currituck, Dare, Gates, Hyde, Pasquotank, Perquimans, Tyrrell, and Washington countries, will vote Wednesday in Hertford on whether to keep the bridge project as a “regional priority” or to allow it to go back into the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) to re-compete for funding with other regional transportation projects.
If the Mid-Currituck Bridge, which currently enjoys a commitment of $173 million in State funding, were to lose its priority, it essentially would return to Square One after decades of effort and advocacy by proponents, failed litigation by opponents, pre-construction meetings and permitting applications, and so much more that has been necessary to launch the project.
We recall speaking at a public hearing about the bridge in Aydlett, which would be its mainland entry point, about 1997.
Thirty years ago, the traffic heading north on N.C. Hwy 12 in Southern Shores on summer weekends was an inconvenience, not the disaster it has become, and the cut-through route on South Dogwood Trail had not been discovered. Duck also was not an incorporated town, and Corolla had just started to boom beyond its infrastructure capabilities.
The ARPO, which develops and advances transportation planning for the 10-county region, collaborates in that process with District One of the N.C. Dept. of Transportation. District One covers a 14-county region that overlaps the ARPO’s 10 counties.
As previously reported, representatives from the NCDOT will be present at the Town Council’s special meeting to update the public on the status of the bridge and to answer questions. (See The Beacon, 4/9/26)
In its resolution supporting the “continued inclusion” of the bridge project in the NCDOT’s STIP, the Town Council acknowledges the profound funding gap between the State’s committed $173 million funding and projected toll revenues and the current cost estimate to build the bridge of $1.2 billion, and asks NCDOT to keep the bridge in STIP as a prioritized project long enough for “stakeholders,” including the N.C. Turnpike Authority and regional partners, to identify new revenue sources, such as federal grants.
The financial shortfall seems overwhelming, but so does its hasty abandonment.
The Southern Shores Town Council would like to fill the chairs in the Pitts Center for the meeting and hear from a long line of residents at the public lectern.
If you cannot make it to the meeting, you may live-stream it on the Southern Shores You Tube site at https://www.youtube.com/c/SouthernShores (be sure to click on “Live” at the top).
LONGER HOURS FOR LEAVING UNATTENDED TENTS ON BEACH
We mentioned in our previous post about Tuesday’s meeting that a Town Code Text Amendment (TCA) on “tents” would be considered by the Council. This TCA turns out to be about tents and other belongings being left on the beach overnight.
Currently, Town Code section 34-55(b)(2) prohibits leaving unattended personal articles on the beach, such as poles, tents, chairs, cabanas, umbrellas, volleyball nets, and “any other personal property items,” between the hours of 5 p.m. and 7 a.m. TCA 2026-2 would amend the ordinance to prohibit personal belongings being left unattended between 7 p.m. and 6 a.m.
The longer daytime hours “better reflect how people actually use the beach,” according to the Town staff’s recommendation.
We would expect this amendment to sail through.
****
You may access the Town Council’s meeting packet at https://mccmeetings.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/soshoresnc-pubu/MEET-Packet-eafc09aadc914edfa3132352db910d68.pdf
An item on the Consent Agenda, which usually consists of routine, non-controversial items that do not require extensive discussion, caught our eye.
It is a resolution by the Town Council in opposition to the N.C. General Assembly’s proposal to amend the N.C. Constitution to require the State legislature to limit the amount local governments can increase property taxes.
According to a Town staff agenda item in the meeting packet, “If enacted, this policy would automatically lower property tax rates when property values rise during revaluations to prevent local governments from gaining a ‘windfall.’”
Known as Bill Draft 2025-MCfy-226, this change in property tax-rate setting would need to be approved by three-fifths of the members in both the N.C. House of Delegates and the N.C. Senate and approved by statewide public referendum in order to become law.
If it comes out of the General Assembly, this constitutional amendment would be on the Nov. 3 general selection ballot. It is currently in the House Select Committee on Property Tax Reduction and Reform.
See the Bill Draft at https://webservices.ncleg.gov/ViewDocSiteFile/105417.
We would have liked to know the background behind this apparently audacious maneuver by the General Assembly and have been unable to find anything online.
As you might expect, the Town Council speaks in its resolution to such tax-rate decisions being left to the judgment and discretion of locally elected officials, who know their communities’ needs and the cost of services and are accountable to their constituents.
By Ann G. Sjoerdsma, The Southern Shores Beacon, 4/13/26









