Sandmark Custom Homes’ renovation of the beach cottage at 223 Ocean Blvd. in Southern Shores is featured in the 2024 Parade of Homes. (Photo credit: Dare County GIS)
The four-day 2024 Outer Banks Parade of Homes starts Thursday and features three properties in Southern Shores, one of which is a space renovation in the Southern Shores Crossing for the long-awaited coffee shop.
The homes in the 32nd annual Parade of Homes will be open Thursday through Saturday, from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. A trade expo and builder awards ceremony will be held Sunday, from 10 a.m. to 2:30 p.m., at Jennette’s Pier in Nags Head.
Tickets are $20 each and may be purchased online with a credit card or for cash at one of the participating homes. For ticket information, see https://www.obhomebuilders.org/2024-tickets/.
Sixteen of the properties on display are located in the beach zone, from Corolla to Nags Head, and the remaining two are on the mainland, one in Currituck County and the other in Manteo.
The Manteo entry is actually a remodel by SAGA Realty and Construction of the Firetender Restaurant, which is past the Manteo Hotel on Hwy. 64/264. The other commercial remodel in the parade is Neal Contracting Co.’s renovation in the Southern Shores Crossing, at 1 Ocean Blvd., for Shore Coffee Roasters
Unfortunately, the Outer Banks Home Builders Assn. (OBHA), which hosts the parade, did not include the addresses of the homes on its listing page. You have to click on the individual home links to uncover them.
An interactive parade map is available on the OBHA’s website, but we did not find it particularly helpful. Perhaps a free Parade of Homes magazine available for pickup at the properties will have an easy-to-use list of addresses.
The other two parade homes in Southern Shores are a renovation by Sandmark Custom Homes, Inc., of a beach cottage at 223 Ocean Blvd. (see photo above), and the construction of a new home by Maso Design Build at 97 Ocean Blvd., which is on the west side of Ocean Boulevard at its intersection with Chicahauk Trail. You may park in the town parking lot on Chicahauk Trail to tour 97 Ocean Blvd.
All three of the builders represented in Southern Shores are husband-and-wife teams who live in the town. Sandmark Custom Homes also has a home in Harbinger, at 204 Cynthia Ct., in the parade.
The 18 properties will be available for viewing online after the parade, according to FAQs on the OBHA website. Virtual tours will remain active for at least one year, it says.
The Outer Banks Tourism Bureau is a parade partnership sponsor with the OBHA.
COMING UP: EARLY VOTING; BULK TRASH PICKUP
*You no doubt have heard that early voting for the Nov. 5 general election starts Oct. 17 and continues until Nov. 2. If you are a Dare County resident, you may vote at any one of the three voting sites, listed below. On Election Day, you may only vote at your assigned polling place.
Early voting polls are:
Kill Devil Hills Town Hall, 102 Town Hall Drive, KDH
Dare County Administrative Bldg., 954 Marshall C. Collins Drive, Manteo
Fessenden Center Annex, 47017 Buxton Back Road, Buxton
Voting hours are:
Thurs., Oct. 17, and Fri. Oct. 18: 8 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
Mon., Oct. 21 through Fri., Nov. 1: 8 a.m. to 7:30 p.m.
The ballot also includes an important proposed amendment to the N.C. Constitution that would restrict voting in state elections to U.S. citizens only. You are being asked to vote “for” or “against” citizens-only voting in North Carolina.
BULK TRASH PICKUP IS OCT. 18
The town-wide autumn bulk trash pickup will be held Fri., Oct. 18. You may begin putting approved items—a list of which is available through the website link below—on the roadside a week before. (No TVs, no building supplies, no rugs!)
Is the yellow paint color used on this building in the Southern Shores Crossing subtle, neutral and earth tone?
The Southern Shores Town Council met on July 2 for its regular monthly business meeting. The following are highlights from the meeting:
COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS: In a rare display of disagreement, Town Council members split on some of the new commercial design standards recommended by the Planning Board and included in a Zoning Text Amendment that the Council first took up at its June meeting and then tabled for further consideration at the July meeting.
Expediency won out, as if often does, with three of the five members voting July 2 to approve the language before them in ZTA 24-03, and only change one word. The ZTA, which was subject to public hearing in June, sets forth 11 design standards with which “new construction and substantial improvements” must comply. It also defines what a substantial improvement is.
After the 3-2 vote, the Town Council coalesced around an idea promoted by Mayor Pro Tem Matt Neal, who was in the minority, of involving the “larger community” in a task force- or committee-led effort to create a “real vision” of Southern Shores’ small commercial district at the southern end of town.
Mr. Neal spoke of formulating a “small-area plan” for the “enhancement of our commercial district”—which would apply for 10 years, 20 years, even 50 years “down the line”—and referred to the vision statement and land-use recommendations in the newly updated Southern Shores Comprehensive CAMA Land Use Plan (LUP) for guidance and support.
The Council left the “framework” for such a task force up to the Town staff, which is expected to make a proposal at an upcoming meeting.
(For further information, see our recap of the Council’s discussion below.)
NEW LAND USE PLAN: After a public hearing, during which no one spoke, the Town Council unanimously approved the updated Comprehensive CAMA Land Use Plan (LUP), which was drafted with Town support by consultant Stewart, Inc.—provided the plan receives a final edit.
Councilwoman Paula Sherlock drew attention to some typographical and syntactic errors in the text, after which Councilman Mark Batenic insisted that the plan be thoroughly reviewed.
(Having been in touch with the consultant about the many errors present in an earlier draft, we would recommend hiring a professional proofreader to bring “fresh eyes” to the document.)
After the final edit is done, Mr. Haskett will submit the plan to the N.C. Division of Coastal Management (DCM) for review. The DCM acts as staff for the N.C. Coastal Resources Commission, which must certify the LUP for it to take effect. The DCM will notify Mr. Haskett of any questions it may have about the LUP.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING INITIATIVE: Michael Zehner, a professional planner and alternate member on the Town Planning Board, spoke to the Town Council, on behalf of the Board, asking the Council to “take some initiative” on addressing affordable housing, aka workforce housing, in Southern Shores.
Mr. Zehner used the official definition promulgated by the U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development to define “affordable” housing as housing that costs 30 percent or less of a household’s gross income, including utilities. The term is often used in a different sense to refer to specific housing assistance programs, such as those that reserve a number of units in a residential complex for low-income renters or owners.
Mr. Zehner, who led a discussion about affordable housing in the Planning Board at its May meeting, said he was conveying the Board’s recommendation that the Town engage the public to find out, first of all, if residents believe affordable housing is/is not a “problem” in Southern Shores, and, secondly, if it is, how residents would like to address/resolve it.
He suggested that a public study could be done. The survey done just two years ago for the update of the LUP did not include affordable housing as a topic, per se.
In advocating for a community task force to develop a plan for the commercial district, Mr. Neal suggested incorporating affordable housing options.
He also expressed, during his closing comments, an interest in talking about accessory dwelling units in Southern Shores, which, under current Town Code ordinance, are not permitted. The Code allows for separate living space that is accessory to a principal residence, but the space cannot constitute a dwelling unit.
The Mayor Pro Tem again turned to the newly approved LUP for support, quoting a land-use recommendation on p. 100 that suggests evaluating “the Town’s current policy on separate living spaces and [considering] revisions to allowances and standards for accessory dwelling units by zoning district.”
(The Chicahauk Property Owners Assn. has a covenant that prohibits accessory dwelling units in Chicahauk and supersedes the Town Code.)
Mr. Neal said he would like to “elevate” the issue of accessory dwelling units, which have been suggested as a means to provide affordable housing, and move toward taking action.
MILFOIL SURVEY: Town Manager Cliff Ogburn reported that the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality will be conducting a survey of the presence of Eurasian milfoil in the Southern Shores canals during the “second half of July.” Mr. Ogburn anticipates having DEQ’s results to present to the Town Council at its September meeting.
JUNIPER TRAIL/CHICAHAUK TRAIL BRIDGE/CULVERT: Mr. Ogburn also reported that the construction contract for the renovation of the Juniper Trail/Chicahauk Trail bridge and culvert will be out for bid on Sept. 9 and remain open until Oct. 4. The Town Manager hopes to receive at least three bids and to be able to present them to the Town Council at its November meeting.
SOUTHERN SHORES CEMETERY: Councilwoman Sherlock is heading up an effort to beautify and enhance the Southern Shores Cemetery, which is located at 64 S. Dogwood Trail and has substantial funding for maintenance. Ms. Sherlock reported that she met at the cemetery with 15 people who have family members buried in, and/or own plots in, the cemetery, and with arborist Andy McConaghy, who lives in Southern Shores, to discuss improvements.
Apparently, some people have suggested removing some of the trees that make the cemetery such a desirable resting ground. According to Ms. Sherlock, Mr. McConaghy advised her that there are dogwoods in the cemetery that are more than 100 years old and live oaks that are older than 200 years old.
Ms. Sherlock also reported that she, the Town Manager, Public Works Director David Bradley, and a community volunteer spent a couple of hours the morning of July 2, picking up litter, including beer bottles, “dead plants and faded flowers,” at the cemetery. A volunteer-led litter patrol would seem to be in order.
BONUS COVERAGE: ELABORATING ON COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
Mayor Pro Tem Neal, who is an experienced builder, initiated the Town Council’s discussion of ZTA 24-03, which adds a new section (36-179), titled “Commercial design standards,” to the Town Code of Ordinances. He also led the Council’s discussion on the measure at the June meeting. (See The Beacon, 6/14/24.)
Mr. Neal made the case for deleting three of the 11 proposed design standards in ZTA 24-03 and received support from Councilman Batenic.
The standard that primarily divided Mr. Neal and Mr. Batenic from the other three Council members was one requiring “exterior building paint colors” to be “subtle, neutral and earth tone colors.”
“That level of detail needs to be more of a community-led decision, rather than a Council [decision],” Mr. Neal said, noting that many of the town’s flat tops wouldn’t meet this requirement.
Councilwoman Sherlock, who was the most vocal in opposing the Mayor Pro Tem’s suggestions, responded: “I think that’s what our community wants in the commercial area. They don’t want some glaring . . . [trickle off inaudibly] I don’t think they want the big, bright-colored buildings. They don’t want the yellow building.”
Mr. Neal replied that he knows “some who wouldn’t care,” and that Ms. Sherlock would be surprised by opinions in town outside of the Council’s “limited circles.”
[We represent such an opinion and prefer a colorful and beachy look in the Town’s commercial buildings to the “neutral,” cookie-cutter façades we currently see at The Marketplace. Not every colorful building is garish.]
Mr. Neal also commented upon the lack of specificity in the adjectives, “neutral” and “subtle,” which may be evaluated differently depending on the eye of the beholder. We note that even the description, “earth tone,” is subject to interpretation, and every effort should be made in legislation to enact unambiguous, precise terms that make clear the intent of the Council.
Mr. Neal quoted from the newly updated Land Use Plan—which the Town Council unanimously approved later in the meeting—to support his position.
“When creating building design standards,” he read from p. 102 of the LUP, “the community should be involved in the process.”
Saying that they “don’t do anything” or “add anything” to the new ordinance, Mr. Neal also argued in favor of deleting the following two design standards:
“Architectural embellishments with a coastal design that add visual interest are encouraged.” (No. 8)
“Low impact development techniques utilized to mitigate potential stormwater impacts are encouraged.” (No. 9)
Clearly, to “encourage” commercial property owners to do something is not the same as to hold them to an enforceable standard, which all Council members recognized. We would have deleted this language for that reason. Mr. Neal noted that the concept of a “coastal architectural style” is very broad, and, again, Mr. Batenic supported him.
Mayor Elizabeth Morey, Councilman Rob Neilson, and Councilwoman Sherlock all said they “like” these two “standards,” and Ms. Sherlock observed that, despite the lack of enforceability, they are a “message about what we want businesses to aspire to.”
Mr. Batenic took issue with another standard that reads: “Building elements that resemble animals, lighthouses, castles or pirate ships are prohibited.” (No. 11)
The Councilman noted that “you could have lollipops” or other elements not singled out in the standards, and said he thought “the whole idea was not to have anything on the outside.”
“You could make a prohibited emblems list a mile long,” Mr. Neal said.
Ms. Sherlock recalled that she asked Mr. Haskett at the June meeting about this standard and posed the hypothetical of having a slice of pizza on the outside: Would that be permissible?
Mr. Haskett distinguished “building elements” from signs and said he thought the pizza slice would be interpreted as a sign, which would be regulated by the Town’s sign ordinance.
The word “element” was not defined in ZTA 24-03.
No one suggested deleting this standard or rewriting it so that the intent behind the prohibition would be effectuated without listing specific “elements.”
Finished vs. Floor Area Ratio
Mr. Neal again brought up the ZTA’s use of the term, “finished area,” which it defines by referring to the definition in the Town Code for “living space.”
At the June meeting, Mr. Neal said that he was not familiar with the ZTA’s terms of “finished area” and “finished area ratio” and explained that professional builders use the standards of “floor area” and “floor area ratio.”
Mr. Neal said that “floor area,” which he defined as “all square footage within the exterior walls” of a building, is typically used to control density on a commercial property. The floor area ratio is derived by dividing the floor area by the building lot area.
Under the new ordinance, the square footage of the “finished area,” which as “living space” is essentially the area usable for human habitation, is divided by the land area to arrive at a required “finished area ratio” for buildings in the commercial district. This ratio is limited to 0.35 in one of the new design standards. (No. 10)
Mr. Neal noted at the July meeting that “finished area” is “subject to change” because some of the square footage considered uninhabitable could be converted to “living space” and vice versa.
“I’d like it to be more immutable, personally,” he said, but he eventually withdrew his objection to the new term, provided Deputy Town Manager/Planning Director Wes Haskett redefines it so that it has a separate definition, apart from “living space.”
The new definition was not made part of the motion that resulted in the ZTA being adopted nor did the Council provide a definition.
We believe the issue of density and what building area to consider is of more relevance in a mixed-use development, than in a traditional commercial development where there is no residential space.
If SAGA Realty & Construction had been limited to a finished area ratio of 0.35 in the buildings it proposed for its Ginguite Creek property, one Planning Board member informed us, the living space in its buildings would have been reduced.
According to the new LUP, Southern Shores’ commercial district is 38 acres, or 2 percent of the town’s land area.
According to the current Land Use Plan, which was certified by the N.C. Coastal Resources Commission in 2012, the commercial district is 56 acres, or 2.6 percent of the town’s total land area of 2,175 acres.
We wonder why there is this discrepancy.
As noted above, ZTA 24-03 eventually passed, by a 3-2 vote, with just a one-word change. Although the one word is a significant one—changing “shall” to “may”—in a section pertaining to the submission of a site plan review of a proposed development for new construction or substantial improvements in the general commercial district, we exercise our prerogative not to probe this esoterica further. The new ordinance does not change the fact that the Planning Board will scrutinize all sketch plan reviews.
ZTA 24-03 also changes the off-street parking requirements in the Town Code (Sec. 36-163) by allowing a business to reduce its required parking by one space for every 20 parking spaces, if it plants a shade tree instead. The Town Council unanimously supported this amendment.
The Council’s discussion about the design standards ended with Mr. Neal saying, “This document doesn’t get us there,” and Councilwoman Sherlock responding, “But it’s a step in the right direction.”
Mayor Elizabeth Morey will host a Mayor’s chat on Wednesday, at 4:30 p.m., in the Pitts Center—the first such chat this year and in quite some time. Mayor Morey has said that she discontinued her informal gatherings with Southern Shores residents, which she began during the first year of her tenure, because they were poorly attended.
Town staff members, including Town Manager Cliff Ogburn, also will attend the Mayor’s chat.
Also next week, the Southern Shores Planning Board will meet Monday at 5 p.m. in the Pitts Center for its regular monthly meeting. Board members will take up a new Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA 24-04) that proposes establishing planned unit developments as a special use in the general commercial district and prohibiting bitcoin mining in all zoning districts. The Town Code currently permits PUDs as of right.
ZTA 24-04 also revisits an issue that first arose in ZTA 24-02. It proposes requiring property owners to obtain a lot disturbance/stormwater management permit in order to remove trees greater than 6 inches in diameter and at least 4.5 feet tall from a front, side, or rear yard setback on any unimproved lot in all zoning districts. The earlier proposed provision applied only in the general commercial district, not in the residential and government-institutional districts, as well. The Board directed the Town staff to revise the proposed provision so that it applies throughout town.
The Planning Board will continue its discussion about accessory dwelling units in town. The N.C. General Assembly, which ends its 2023-24 session on July 31, has proposed a bill that would require municipalities to permit accessory dwelling units in single-family housing residential districts. The bill has passed the House, but not the Senate.
We note that when the cut-through weekend traffic was still considered a talking point in town, the Mayor drew a vocal group of residents to a summertime chat. Perhaps residents can target pedestrians in town roadways with more success.
Too often pedestrians walking on roads without sidewalks walk in the direction of the traffic rather than against oncoming traffic, as North Carolina law (N.C. General Statutes sec. 20-174(d)), the National Highway Safety Administration, and common-sense safety dictate. Perhaps the Town could post some “Walk Facing Traffic” signs on heavily traveled roads. (We note that the law requires bicyclists traveling in roadways to go with the traffic.)
We regret that we have been unable to attend or keep up with Town meetings in recent months. We will strive to have a report of the July 2 Town Council meeting posted on our blog before the Mayor’s chat on Wednesday.
Water service to residents of South Dogwood Trail who live between Osprey Lane and Fairway Drive will be disrupted today starting at 9 a.m., so the Dare County Water Dept. can do maintenance to a fire hydrant, according to an announcement on the Town website.
Residents on this section of South Dogwood Trail will be without water from 9 a.m. until service is restored, which is expected to be by 5 p.m.
If you do not live on South Dogwood Trail, and you are without water, the Water Dept. asks that you call its office at (252) 475-5990.
A public hearing will be held at the Town Council’s meeting Tuesday, at 5:30 p.m., on the newly revised Southern Shores Comprehensive CAMA Land Use Plan (LUP), after which the Council will vote on the plan’s adoption and submission to the State for certification. The N.C. Division of Coastal Management must review and approve the LUP before it can take effect.
Also on the Town Council’s agenda are further discussion of Zoning Text Amendment 24-03 concerning newly drafted design standards for the commercial district; an update from Town Manager Cliff Ogburn about the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality’s survey of milfoil in the Southern Shores canals, which the Council approved June 4; and a report on affordable housing options in Southern Shores by Planning Board Alternate Member Michael Zehner, which was postponed from the Council’s June 4 meeting because of Mr. Zehner’s unavailability.
Tuesday’s meeting will take place, as usual, in the Kern Pitts Center behind Town Hall.
A representative from Stewart, Inc., the Raleigh-based consultant whom the Town hired to manage the update and revision of the current Town LUP, will present the final draft of the new LUP to the Town Council and be available virtually to answer questions, according to the meeting agenda.
COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS, ZTA 24-03: ZTA 24-03 was subject to a public hearing on June 4, but no one spoke other than Deputy Town Manager/Planning Director Wes Haskett, who sought to withdraw the proposed ordinance to work on it further. After some discussion the Town Council unanimously voted to table ZTA 24-03 until Tuesday’s meeting. See The Beacon, 6/14/24, for a report.
The latest version of ZTA 24-03 is included in the meeting packet (see link above) on pages 2-8.
One of the stumbling points for the Town Council, in particular, Mayor Pro Tem Matt Neal, was the Planning Board’s inclusion in the proposed ZTA of a “maximum finished area ratio” for all buildings in the general commercial district. The ZTA defines finished area ratio as the “living space” in buildings divided by the “net acreage of a lot.”
According to the Southern Shores Town Code, “living space” includes only the enclosed, conditioned area within a structure that is designed or constructed for “human habitation,” and “net acreage” is the total land area to be developed after the acreage covered by waterways, marshes, or wetlands is subtracted. (Town Code sec. 36-57.)
ZTA 24-03 proposes that the finished area ratio for all buildings in the commercial district not exceed 0.35. According to Mr. Haskett’s staff report on ZTA 24-03 for the Council’s June 4 meeting, the Southern Shores Marketplace has a finished area ratio of 0.20; the Southern Shores Crossing has an FA ratio of 0.14; and TowneBank’s FA ratio is 0.12.
Another common ratio used in urban planning and real estate development, we have learned, is the floor area ratio or “FAR.” It is derived by dividing the total floor area of buildings by the total lot area.
The purpose of both ratios is to determine, and limit, the density of construction in an area.
We have not caught up on the Planning Board meetings to be able to analyze ZTA 24-03 in detail for you, but we will attempt to do so after Tuesday’s meeting. We believe it would facilitate the Council’s discussion of the measure if a member of the Planning Board were present at the meeting to answer questions and to elaborate upon the Board’s intentions.
REPORT ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING: The Beacon previewed Mr. Zehner’s presentation to the Town Council on affordable housing options in Southern Shores on 6/2/24. Please see that article for background. No description of Mr. Zehner’s postponed talk has been provided in the meeting agenda or packet for Tuesday.
During the Planning Board’s May meeting, Mr. Zehner, who is the Board’s First Alternate, proposed holding “educational sessions” in town about affordable housing and encouraging people to “air their concerns” about its availability in Southern Shores.
A planning professional, he said the cheapest house then for sale in Southern Shores was listed at $525,000 and defined affordability as costing “no more than 30 percent of household income.”
In a presentation June 25 to the Dare County Housing Task Force, Tyler Mulligan, a professor of public law and government in the University of North Carolina School of Government, defined affordable as “not cost-burdened” and “cost-burdened” as spending more than 30 percent of one’s gross income on housing.
(Today, according to realtor.com, there are a fixer-upper on Duck Road, built in 1976, listed for sale at $339,000 and a 672-square-foot cottage, built in 1955 and renovated, on South Dogwood Trail, listed for $399,000 and under contract for an undisclosed amount. All other listings exceed $525,000.)
Mr. Zehner suggested in May that a starting point for a conversation among Town residents would be an examination of the problem, specifically addressing whether people believe a problem in affordable housing exists in Southern Shores and “agreeing what the problem is.”
Mr. Zehner expressed an interest in being “proactive,” in taking a leadership role, and in embarking on a study of both the problem of, and strategies for increasing, affordable housing in Southern Shores.
At the suggestion of Planning Board chairman Andy Ward, the Board agreed to have Mr. Zehner speak to the Town Council about the issue.
PUBLIC HEARING ON TCA 24-02: Besides the revised final-draft LUP, the Town Council will hold a public hearing on Town Code Amendment 24-02 at Tuesday’s meeting. TCA 24-02, found at pages 15-19 of the meeting packet, is another in a series of amendments introduced by Town staff to modernize the Town Code, as the Town Council authorized it to do in February.
This time, the focus of changes is on 1) adding definitions for “development” and “developmental approval” to the Town Code that are based on definitions in an N.C. general statute; and 2) amending the Code to allow the submission of a FEMA-approved form, survey, or other documentation prepared by a licensed professional that demonstrates that the natural grade of a parcel exceeds the RFPE [Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation] of eight feet instead of the submission of an under-construction and finished-construction elevation certificate in shaded X and X flood zones.
We imagine these changes will be approved without objection.
FINAL WORDS ON THE LAND USE PLAN
The N.C. Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) requires all 20 coastal counties to have a local LUP in accordance with guidelines established by the Coastal Resources Commission (CRC), which consists of 13 members appointed by various public officials, including the Governor, the Speaker of the N.C. House, and the Senate President Pro Tempore.
(You may know from recent concerns about the status of Jockey’s Ridge that the CRC is responsible for designating areas of environmental concern within the coastal region and for adopting rules and policies for development within those areas.)
Towns are not required to have land use plans, but all of the towns in Dare County do. These plans serve as blueprints for growth and include policies and guidance for such growth-related topics as resources protection, economic development, and storm hazard reduction. The N.C. Division of Coastal Management, which serves as staff to the CRC, is supposed to use local land plans in making its CAMA permit decisions.
An important element in all local land use plans is the municipality’s vision statement. The community vision statement in the updated Southern Shores LUP is as follows:
“The Town of Southern Shores is a quiet coastal community comprised primarily of low-density single-family homes interspersed with passive and active recreational facilities, navigable waterways, forests, and open space. The Town’s identity is intimately tied to its natural resources, history, and residential nature. We strive to protect Southern Shores’ environment, enhance the small commercial district located on the southern edge of town, and preserve the Town’s unique qualities by maintaining the existing community appearance and form.”
All ordinances enacted by the Southern Shores Town Council must be in compliance with the Town LUP, especially the vision statement.
Upon approval by the Town Council, the updated LUP will be sent to the Division of Coastal Management for review. The Division must approve the plan before submitting it to the CRC for certification.
The LUP currently in effect in Southern Shores dates to 2008. It was finally certified by the CRC in 2012, after the Town belatedly responded to questions asked by the Division of Coastal Management. Such delay is not expected to occur this time.
****
Happy Fourth of July, everyone.
The Town of Southern Shores prohibits fireworks, but you can watch fireworks displays in Avon, Nags Head, Manteo, Kill Devil Hills, Duck, and Corolla.
The Southern Shores Town Council had one of its busier meetings last week:
Approving a Town budget of $12,795,709 for fiscal year 2024-25, which starts July 1;
Learning from a N.C. State professor a multitude of facts about Eurasian milfoil, before authorizing the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality to survey Southern Shores canals for presence of the invasive weed;
Discussing proposed changes to the Town Zoning Ordinance that would establish design standards for the commercial district; and
Re-appointing two full members and two alternate members of the Planning Board to new three-year terms.
The one agenda topic the Town Council did not reach June 4 was affordable housing because Planning Board Alternate Michael Zehner, a professional planner who was going to initiate a Town “conversation,” could not attend the meeting. Mr. Zehner’s presentation was rescheduled to the Council’s July 2 meeting.
Police Chief David Kole also reported that a background check was then in process for a new officer and that Senior Patrol Officer Christopher L. Simpson had been promoted to sergeant.
The next Town Council meeting will be July 2, 5:30 p.m., in the Pitts Center. Mayor Elizabeth Morey announced that she will hold a Mayor’s chat on Wed., July 17, from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m., in the Pitts Center.
For background on the June 4 meeting agenda topics, see The Beacon, 6/2/24. For the meeting agenda and background materials, see:
At the invitation of Town Manager Cliff Ogburn, Professor Rob Richardson, the Dept. of Crop Science at N.C. State University, appeared via Zoom, to give a thorough and comprehensive presentation about Eurasian milfoil, an invasive weed that typically grows in shallow waterways.
It was all you would ever want to know—and then some.
Dr. Richardson, who is the Aquatic and Non-Cropland Weed Scientist at N.C. State, covered what Eurasian milfoil is and where it is found in the United States; how to control milfoil, which grows from seeds in sediment into matted infestations, so it does not block the use of waterways; and how to eradicate milfoil, if that is a goal.
The Professor characterized Eurasian milfoil, which is typically found in the Northeast and Midwest and not as far south as North Carolina, as a “weak submersed aquatic perennial.”
During an excellent question-and-answer session with the Town Council after his talk, Dr. Richardson said the presence of the noxious invasive weed in a waterway varies from year-to-year—depending on such factors as water salinity and temperature, rainfall amounts, the effects of storms, waterway shading, and plant disease.
Dr. Richardson explained that there are 15 herbicides available to treat milfoil, and they come in either a granular (pellets) or liquid form. They all use a chemical known as 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), which was an ingredient in Agent Orange, an herbicide and defoliant used by the U.S. military during the Vietnam War that caused harm to human beings.
It was not the 2,4-D in Agent Orange that caused the herbicide’s toxicity, Dr. Richardson said in response to a question from the Council. It was the combination of 2,4-D with 2,4,5-T (Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid), whose synthesis produces dioxin, which is highly toxic to animals and humans.
2,4,5-T is no longer used in U.S. herbicides.
At its May meeting, the Town Council considered signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality to enter into a 50-50 cost-sharing milfoil eradication treatment partnership. (See The Beacon, 5/4/24.)
Only three Town Council members attended the May meeting, and they voted not to take any action on milfoil eradication until NCDEQ conducts a territorial survey of the weed in Southern Shores waterways. (See The Beacon, 6/10/24.)
After Dr. Richardon’s presentation last week, the full Council unanimously approved signing a revised MOU with NCDEQ for a $2,000 aquatic vegetation survey to be conducted between June 3 and Aug. 30, when the weed is reproducing. The survey will determine the distribution and extent of Eurasian milfoil in the canals, and the Town will pay $1,000 toward its cost.
Dr. Richardson said a 2,4-D herbicide presents a “very low risk to animals and humans,” but it can damage other plants and, thus, the aquatic habitat. He also said its effects on milfoil last from 18 months to four years.
COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS
The Town Council spent a considerable amount of time reviewing Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) 24-03, which adds a new section to the Zoning Ordinance on “commercial design standards” (Sec. 36-179) and also new definitions intended to limit the “building area,” i.e., the footprint, in the commercial district.
The ZTA introduces the concept of a “finished area ratio,” which it defines as the “finished area divided by the land area,” where “finished area” is the same as heated “living space” (Town Code sec. 36-57) and “land area” means “the net acreage of a lot.” A proposed commercial design standard in ZTA 24-03 limits the “finished area ratio” for all buildings to 0.35.
Because of time constraints, we did not attend the Planning Board’s May 20 meeting, during which members discussed ZTA 24-03, or listen to the meeting videotape. We understand from Deputy Town Manager/Planning Director Wes Haskett’s agenda item summary that the Planning Board, by a 3-2 vote, recommended approval of ZTA 24-03 at that meeting, but also “noted,” Mr. Haskett writes, “that the ZTA is for informational purposes, a first pass.” The Board encouraged the Town Council to “consider a larger evaluation or study of the Town’s commercial properties in the commercial corridor.”
You will find ZTA 24-03 on pp. 22-27 in the June 4 meeting packet. It also has a proposed change to the off-street parking requirements in the Town Code (Sec. 36-163) that would allow a business to reduce its required parking by one space for every 20 parking spaces, if it plants a shade tree instead. The idea is to reduce the formation of asphalt deserts.
We will not delve too deeply into Council members’ discussion of ZTA 24-03, which was principally led by Mayor Pro Tem Matt Neal, who is a professional builder.
The Council held a public hearing on the ZTA, but no one from the public spoke.
Mr. Neal questioned the new terminology, in particular, the concept of “maximum finished area ratio,” asking where it came from and commenting that “the term is not taught in school.” Floor area ratio is the term he uses and knows and would prefer to continue using.
Mr. Haskett’s response implied that the term came from Mr. Zehner, who previously served as planning director of Nags Head for about 2 1/2 years.
“I like where [the ZTA is] headed,” Mr. Neal said, “I just don’t think it’s a complete document.”
Councilwoman Paula Sherlock called it an “excellent start.” Councilman Mark Batenic thought the ZTA contained ambiguities and “needs further review” before he could pass it.
Observing that “there’s a lot that needs to be amended” in the ZTA, Mr. Neal suggested forming a consulting group to “blue sky this thing and think about what we want our commercial district to look like.”
Ultimately, the Council unanimously voted to table ZTA 24-03 until its July 2 meeting, at which time we would expect the measure to have been revised to address some of the Council’s concerns.
IN OTHER ACTION:
The Town Council unanimously approved Mr. Ogburn’s Recommended Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget of $12,795,709, after it held the State-mandated public hearing. No one from the public spoke.
The Council unanimously approved designation of the flat top cottage at 13 Skyline Road, which the Town owns and partially renovated, as a historic landmark. No one spoke during the public hearing on the historic landmark designation application except Mr. Haskett.
The Council unanimously approved a FY 2023-24 budget amendment of $264,789, the funds to come from the Town’s Unassigned Fund Balance and to be applied to street improvements at the end of the third year (June 30, 2024) of the Town’s 10-year street improvement plan. The advance will reduce the amount of work funded in the fourth year, which begins July 1.
The Council unanimously approved reappointing regular Planning Board Members Andy Ward and Robert McClendon and Alternates Michael Zehner and Charles Ries to new three-year terms, beginning July 1, 2024 and expiring June 30, 2027.
In her comments at the end of the meeting, Mayor Morey said the Juniper Trail Culvert Replacement Project will start construction “after the first of the year,” rather than at the end of 2024, as the Town Manager had previously announced.
THE PLANNING BOARD will meet on Monday, June 17, at 5 p.m. in the Pitts Center. An agenda has not been posted on the Town website, as of this writing.
Dare County has tentatively scheduled a revaluation of all property countywide for Jan. 1, 2025—just five years after it conducted its last real estate appraisal and assessment for tax purposes. This is a shocking change from the County’s customary practice.
The State of North Carolina requires all counties to conduct property revaluations at least every eight years, on an “octennial cycle.” (See N.C. General Statutes sec. 105-286) Counties may “advance” the revaluation cycle, however, if they choose.
Our records show that Dare County has observed a septennial revaluation cycle in recent years, having conducted revaluations on Jan. 1, 1998, Jan. 1, 2005, Jan. 1, 2013, and Jan. 1, 2020. It has never before scheduled a five-year cycle.
News of the County’s tentatively scheduled revaluation next year is the most significant detail uncovered by The Beacon in its review of Town Manager Cliff Ogburn’s recommended fiscal year 2024-25 budget for the Town of Southern Shores.
The recommended budget included in the Town Council’s meeting packet totals $12,795,709, an increase of $22,217 over what the Town Manager (and The Beacon) previously reported. It will be subject to a State-required public hearing at the Town Council’s regular meeting Tuesday.
The Town Council will meet at 5:30 p.m. in the Kern Pitts Meeting Room for what appears on paper to be a business-heavy agenda.
PRESENTATIONS ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND MILFOIL TREATMENT
Also on the Council’s busy agenda are two special presentations:
The first by Planning Board First Alternate Michael Zehner concerns residents’ interest in exploring the problem of (if, indeed, they believe there it is a problem) and potential solutions for affordable housing opportunities in Southern Shores.
The second by Dr. Rob Richardson, the Aquatic and Non-Cropland Weed Specialist at N.C. State University, concerns the noxious weed, Eurasian milfoil, which exists in Southern Shores’ canals and Ginguite Creek, and whether eradicating it with an herbicide that contains the chemical, 2,4-D, poses harm to aquatic and/or human life.
Mr. Zehner, a professional planner who has been attending meetings of the Dare County Housing Task Force, led a discussion about affordable housing at the Town Planning Board’s May 20 meeting. We encourage all property owners to listen to this discussion, which begins at the two-hour mark of the meeting and lasts just over 40 minutes. You will find the meeting video at https://www.youtube.com/@SouthernShores/streams. (We elaborate on this discussion below.)
We previously reported on the Town’s interest in treating milfoil in the canals and Ginguite Creek with a 2,4-D herbicide, 2,4-D being short for the chemical 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, which is notorious for being an ingredient in Agent Orange pesticide. Two,4-D herbicides and pesticides are currently the subject of litigation in federal court in Washington, D.C. between three non-profit environmental groups and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (See The Beacon, 5/4/24)
The Town Manager has sought an Aquatic Weed Control grant from the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) that would permit the Town to partner with NCDEQ in a 50-50 cost-sharing milfoil treatment project. At the May 7 meeting, Mr. Ogburn presented the Town Council with a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with NCDEQ that it had to approve for the $40,000 treatment plan to go forward. (See The Beacon, 5/4/24.)
Only three Town Council members attended the May meeting: They voted not to take any action on treatment of the Town’s milfoil until NCDEQ conducts a territorial survey of the invasive weed in the canals and Ginguite Creek. (See The Beacon, 6/10/24.)
The Town Council will have a different MOU with NCDEQ before it on Tuesday. This one is an agreement for a $2,000 aquatic vegetation survey to be conducted by NCDEQ between June 3 and Aug. 30.
Mr. Ogburn informed the Council last month that Dr. Richardson vouched for the safety of NCDEQ’s herbicide, but as The Beacon has subsequently learned, Dr. Gavin Dehnert, an emerging contaminants scientist with Wisconsin Sea Grant at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, has found that treatment with 2,4-D kills young fish in freshwater lakes. Dr. Dehnert found in both laboratory and lake studies that young fish experience up to a 35 percent increase in mortality when they are exposed to 2,4-D.
We suggest that Mr. Ogburn give Dr. Dehnert a call.
GETTING BACK TO THE BUDGET
Mentioned in passing on page seven of the Town Manager’s overview message to the Town Council, Dare County’s 2025 revaluation plan jumped out at us with a consequence lacking in any of Mr. Ogburn’s requested FY 2024-25 budgetary expenditures, which essentially repeat those of FY 2023-24—with one big exception. (Mr. Ogburn asked department heads to think in terms of a two-year budget, and FY 2024-25 is the second year.)
As we have reported, the big exception is the addition of some major capital expenditures in FY 2024-25, including a $2.1 million appropriation to pay for the Trinitie/Juniper Trail Culvert Replacement project. Construction is expected to begin at the bridge in late 2024, according to the Town Manager.
Other FY 2024-25 capital expenditures requested by Mr. Ogburn include $380,000 for an addition and modifications to the Town Hall building; $290,400 for construction of a sidewalk on the west side of Duck Road (N.C. Hwy. 12) from East Dogwood Trail to Hickory Trail; and $150,000 for maintenance and repair of the existing sidewalk along Duck Road north of Hillcrest Drive.
The Town Hall addition, which has been discussed in previous Council meetings, will expand the space for records collection and storage in the Planning and Code Enforcement Department.
According to the Town Manager’s report, the cost of the sidewalk from East Dogwood to Hickory will be offset by a $118,855 grant from the Outer Banks Tourism Bureau.
The recommended budget total of $12,795,709 is an increase of $3,064,259, or 31.7 percent, over the adopted budget for FY 2023-24. After multiple budgetary amendments during the fiscal year, the actual FY 2023-24 budget was $12,005,501, according to Town data. (See The Beacon, 5/10/24.)
Town history teaches us that the adopted FY 2024-25 budget also will grow with amendments to a much larger actual budget, but so, too, will anticipated revenues.
To balance the FY 2024-25 budget, the Town Manager has proposed appropriating $2,940,988 from the Undesignated Fund Balance (UFB), which, “ideally,” Mr. Ogburn writes in his May message to the Town Council, “should be used for future projects rather than budgeted for annual operating expenses.” (The additional $22,217 requested by the Police Department for staff expenses will be covered by the UFB.)
The Town Council has resolved that $3.5 million must be kept in reserve in the UFB for emergency and disaster-relief purposes. Mr. Ogburn reports that $4,830,326 is now available for use in the FY 2024-25 budget over the reserve amount.
FY 2024-25 marks the fourth year of debt service payments for the 2022 beach nourishment project, which was budgeted at $11,325,189. The Town’s contribution to the cost is $6,065,823, which it satisfies with a special annual tax assessment levied both townwide and according to designated municipal service districts (MSD). The County contributed $4,371,401 to the nourishment project, and the remainder was made up by an NCDEQ grant.
The Town could change the tax rates for beach nourishment debt payment, as long as the required revenue is raised, but the Town Manager makes no recommendation to do so, nor does he recommend a general ad valorem tax rate increase. The property tax levied by the Town on each $100.00 of real and personal property valuation remains 23.58 cents ($0.2358).
We previously published the total appropriations requested by the Town Manager for each Town department. (See The Beacon, 5/10/24.) The only change in those totals is the $22,217 increase in the Police Department budget: from $2,409,492 to $2,431,709.
You will find the Town Manager’s recommended budget at:
DOES SOUTHERN SHORES HAVE AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROBLEM?
In the Planning Board’s discussion last month, Michael Zehner, who moved to Southern Shores in 2020 and was appointed the Second Alternate to the Board in July 2021, proposed holding “educational sessions” in town about affordable housing and encouraging people to “air their concerns” about its availability in Southern Shores.
Mr. Zehner said the then-cheapest house for sale in Southern Shores was listed at $525,000 and defined affordability as costing “no more than 30 percent of household income.”
(We know the $525k house because we were house-hunting in 2019 when it sold in July that year for $337,500. It is tiny and far from the beach. There is an even smaller house for sale now on South Dogwood Trail for a jaw-dropping $399,000. It is a remodeled, 1950s-era cottage.)
He suggested a starting point for a conversation among residents would be addressing whether people believe a problem in affordable housing exists in Southern Shores and “agreeing what the problem is.”
Mr. Zehner, who was elevated this year to First Alternate on the Planning Board, expressed an interest in being “proactive,” in taking a leadership role and embarking on a study of both the problem of, and strategies for increasing, affordable housing in Southern Shores.
He envisions a “Town initiative,” he said.
A native Virginian, Mr. Zehner came from Wellesley, Mass., in 2019 to be planning director for the Town of Nags Head. According to his online CV, he served two years, eight months, in that position and is now director of planning and community development with The Berkeley Group, a consulting firm in Bridgewater, Va., that offers local government and public agency services.
Among the five regular Board members—Mr. Zehner sits on the dais during meetings, but is not a voting member—only Jan Collins enthusiastically supported him. She, too, spoke of being proactive and addressing “what we want Southern Shores to be like in 20 years.”
The others said very little, except when the topic of accessory dwelling units arose. ADUs, which provide income to primary homeowners and potentially open up rentals to more year-round occupants, are one way to address the need for affordable housing.
For the record, while the Town of Southern Shores does not allow living quarters in accessory structures, it does permit “temporary family healthcare structures,” as defined in Town Code sec. 36-168(5), to help facilitate care to a mentally or physically impaired relative. Homeowners in Chicahauk are subject to a property association covenant that prohibits ADUs. (See The Beacon, 3/21/24.)
“From a zoning perspective,” Southern Shores Planning Director Wes Haskett explained to us earlier this year, “someone can live in an accessory structure with living space, and they can be rented, but [the structure] can’t have all of the elements that make up a dwelling unit.”
This has been interpreted in the past to mean that they cannot have ovens and other cooking appliances.
“We want to maintain what we have” in Southern Shores, said Board Chairperson Andy Ward, a longtime resident homeowner who has been critical of ADUs, “and try to be good stewards to a situation that we will never solve at this level.”
At Mr. Ward’s suggestion, the Board agreed to have Mr. Zehner speak to the Town Council about the issue. Ms. Collins suggested that he ask the Council to appoint a study committee.
The Council may wish to wait until after Dare County revalues all real property next year, and we all learn just how “affordable” the booming local housing market is.
Residential trash collection will occur on Tuesday next week, not Monday, Memorial Day, and the two-times-per-week summer collection schedule will start Friday, May 31, the Town of Southern Shores has announced. Please pass the word to your neighbors.
From May 31 until Sept. 2, the trash will be picked up on Fridays and Mondays, in order to accommodate the increased seasonal population. The recycling schedule remains the same.
Replacement of the Juniper Trail bridge-culvert constitutes a major expenditure in the Town’s FY 2024-25 budget.
The decision as to whether and how the Southern Shores canals and Ginguite Creek will be chemically treated this year to eradicate Eurasian milfoil, a noxious aquatic weed that smells like sulfur when it dies, was delayed by the three Town Council members who attended Tuesday’s meeting until the Council’s June 4 meeting.
Town Councilman Mark Batenic and Councilwoman Paula Sherlock did not attend the May 7 meeting. No reason for their absences was given.
Town Manager Cliff Ogburn informed the Council that the N.C. Dept. of Environmental Quality had not performed a requisite survey of the Southern Shores waters to determine how much territory should be treated with a herbicide before presenting the Town with a treatment plan. Sentiment among the Council was that a survey of the milfoil must be performed before the Town can make a commitment to partner 50-50 with the NCDEQ for herbicide treatment. (See The Beacon, 5/4/24, for background.)
Homeowners from Martin’s Point and Southern Shores presented differing views at the Council’s meeting on how much milfoil exists in the Southern Shores canals and Ginguite Creek and whether the herbicide the State proposes to use could do harm to other aquatic plants and fish, as well as to humans.
Mr. Ogburn said he had been in touch with Rob Richardson, a professor at North Carolina State University who is an expert in aquatic weed management, and Dr. Richardson vouched for the safety of NCDEQ’s herbicide, which contains 2,4-D, an ingredient in Agent Orange pesticide that is currently the subject of a lawsuit filed against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (See The Beacon’s 5/4/24 post.)
RECOMMENDED FY 2024-25 BUDGET
Also Tuesday, Mr. Ogburn presented a recommended fiscal year (FY) 2024-25 budget of $12,773,492, an increase of $3,042,042, or about 31 percent, over the recommended FY 2023-24 budget presented at this time last year.
With budget amendments made by the Council throughout the current fiscal year, the actual budget for FY 2023-24 grew from $9,731,450 to $12,005,501, according to Town data.
More than $2 million of the additional expenditures in 2023-24 were covered by funds from the Undesignated (aka Unassigned) Fund Balance, which, according to Mr. Ogburn, totaled $7.8 million, as of the 2023 audit. The Town Council has resolved that $3.5 million must be held in reserve in the UFB and designated for emergency and disaster-relief purposees.
The remaining additional expenditures were covered by higher-than-anticipated revenues, particularly interest.
We would expect the FY 2024-25 budget, which covers July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025, to similarly grow over the course of the fiscal year.
We will take a closer look at the recommended FY 2024-25 budget before the Town Council’s June 4 meeting, when a State-mandated public hearing on the budget will be held.
The expenses in the recommended FY 2024-25 budget, by department or category, are:
$1,465,842: Administration (the largest line item is salaries, $476,346)
$2,409,492: Police Department (salaries, $1,301,457)
$5,235,462: Streets, Bridges, Beaches and Canals ($1,161,237 in debt payment for the beach nourishment project; $3,480,000 for infrastructure, which includes $2.1 million for the Juniper Trail Culvert replacement project, according to Mr. Ogburn. The Town Manager previously said the bridge project would cost $1.6 million.)
$733,924: Public Works (salaries, $381,892)
$991,125: Sanitation ($208,025, for residential solid waste collection; $238,500 for recycling collection; $280,900 for a landfill tipping fee)
$1,207,335: Fire Department ($868,315, for contracted fire protection services; $314,020 for debt payment on fire station)
$229,245: Ocean Rescue
$75,000: Capital Reserve Fund (for canal maintenance)
As of June 2023, the Southern Shores Cemetery Fund had a balance of $92,244 and anticipated expenses of only $3,750 in the next fiscal year. The Town intends to upgrade the cemetery, which is located on South Dogwood Trail next to the Duck Woods Country Club, but it did not budget for improvement expenses.
You may read Mr. Ogburn’s message to the Town Council about his recommended FY 2024-25 budget and the budget itself at:
For more background, see The Beacon, 4/7/24, and our breakdown of the “big-ticket” items in next fiscal year’s budget.
BALLOONS AND LOT WIDTH
Mayor Elizabeth Morey, Mayor Pro Tem Matt Neal, and Town Councilman Rob Neilson unanimously passed an ordinance banning the release of balloons into the open air in Southern Shores, with the exception of balloons used for scientific or meteorological purposes. The ordinance adds section 22-12 to the Town Code and includes a civil penalty of $250 for each violation of the balloon ban.
The three Council members also unanimously voted to “table” Zoning Text Amendment 23-05, which redefines the measurement of lot width, for purposes of establishing minimum lot width for lots created after June 6, 2023.
The Beacon has written extensively about the long-term effort by Deputy Town Manager/Planning Director Wes Haskett, the Planning Board, and the Town Attorney to rewrite the language in the Town Code about lot width to make it less ambiguous. Our last salvo was written 4/23/24.
Before Mayor Pro Tem Neal made a motion to table the ZTA, citing its “lack of clarity,” Mr. Haskett advised the Council during Tuesday’s public hearing on ZTA 23-05 that he did not recommend approval of the version of ZTA 23-05 before it and would like to withdraw the ZTA for further discussion with the Planning Board.
“I don’t think there’s any rush” to finalize the ZTA, Mr. Neal said.
It goes without saying that the unanimous quorum vote on the balloon ordinance was known in advance of the meeting, otherwise the ordinance would not have been on the agenda. We are certain that postponement of the Council’s action on ZTA 23-05 was also known, and we believe that the postponement should have occurred before the meeting. It is conceivable that some of us would have prepared remarks about ZTA 23-05 for the public meeting, unnecessarily so.
We have never known the May meeting of the Town Council, during which the next fiscal year’s budget is presented by the Town Manager, to be attended by only three elected officials.
ARTY, THE TOWN’S K-9 OFFICER
If you’d like to see K-9 Arty eagerly in action with his handler, Southern Shores Patrol Officer Thomas Long, go to the Town of Southern Shores You Tube site, click on the “Live” link, and tune into the first 20 minutes of the May 7, 2024 meeting. (See https://www.youtube.com/@ SouthernShores/streams)
Arty is a friendly 2-year-old Dutch Shepherd who was born in Poland and came to the United States in August 2023, when he met Officer Long and went through basic training. The sleek 57-pound “single-purpose” canine was originally trained with Dutch commands and still responds to them.
Arty’s expertise is in narcotics detection and tracking, which he does by “scent discrimination,” Officer Long explained. The officer took Arty through some basic obedience commands and a narcotics detection exercise at the Town Council meeting, and he enthusiastically responded to every task asked of him.
Arty is one of nine K-9s working in Dare County, according to Officer Long.
The Southern Shores Beacon 